CARDING Discussion about inspection tool result accuracy, and 2D inspection website

nmz56789

Apprentice
MEMBER
Joined
Dec 2, 2025
Messages
71
Reaction score
4
Deposit
0$
1.Is the noVBV accuracy of the checking tool 100%? It seems that the website can only roughly confirm whether it is a 2D website through the source code, but the accurate confirmation still seems to only be tested by filling in the information, right?

2.In addition, I have learned about whether the website has 3D verification. My understanding is that if you check whether there are visa security signs and other information through F12, you can only confirm that these signs must have turned on 3D verification. However, if there is no sign, it does not prove that it must not have 3D verification. In the end, it seems that you can only enter the information to see if the OTP verification code is jumped.

3.And using tools such as wappalyzer can, to a certain extent, allow us to understand which payment methods he uses, such as visa, strip, and paypal, but in the end we still cannot determine the level of the fraud model used by the store.

4. Based on the above method, it seems to me that we have returned to a sandbox testing stage. In the end, the only way is to use card information to test directly?

5.Is my understanding correct? Or is there a better solution? Can we determine whether a website belongs to 2D verification or 3D verification without directly detecting card information?
 
Top Bottom